With my pathological 50MiB 10_000 line nested list test, this is
definitely slower than the one shot parser, but it has peak memory
usage of 5MiB compared to the 120MiB of the one-shot parsing. Not bad.
Obviously this result is largely dependent on the fact that this
particular benchmark is 99% whitespace, which does not get copied into
the resulting document. A (significantly) smaller improvement will be
observed in files that are mostly data with little indentation or
empty lines.
But a win is a win.
torque
7f82c24584
