This was the point that I realized there's no reason to have the string
variants of the publishing methods. But also there's not really much
point in porting the other getting-started examples, since we've
covered all their functionality in the existing examples
(actually, this one is redundant too, but I have already done it, so
it's getting grandfathered in).
Porting some of the more interesting examples might be a good idea, but
those have a weird argument parser that I don't really want to port
(even though it is very simple in the way that it works). For the most
part, I think writing unit tests will do a better of flexing the
bindings.
I think I am probably going to move unit tests to a separate
directory/file structure. This will allow me to add a bunch of utility
functions that don't get analyzed for the library compilation and also
avoid testing-only imports in the main modules.
This builds a very basic version of the nats.c client (no TLS, no
streaming/jetstream/whatever, since those bring in complex
dependencies and I do not need them at the moment). Right now it
contains a simple test program that demonstrates the functionality
(cool!), but the plan is for the nats.zig to bind the API into a
nicer, zig-like shape and re-export it. Then this becomes a package.
The current function could become a test, though it's a bit complex
for a unit test (and requires connecting to an externally-running NATS
server in order to work).
