At some point, (probably during the llvm 16 upgrade, though I haven't
done the legwork to actually narrow it down), zig developed a crash
around the way inline was used here. Since using `inline` was an air
quotes optimization, we can just chuck the designation for the time
being so that compilation will succeed. This may remove more inlines
than is strictly necessary, but I am bravely willing to make that
sacrifice.
See: ziglang/zig#15668
torque
49edb642e3
