From 6e1199afa924c92e7236ad47c3c736be1bbde8c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: torque <torque@epicyclic.dev>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 22:40:26 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] meta: fix redundant qualifiers and improve tuple field
 generation

---
 source/meta.zig | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/source/meta.zig b/source/meta.zig
index a60d34b..ea3afa6 100644
--- a/source/meta.zig
+++ b/source/meta.zig
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ pub fn MutatingZSplitter(comptime T: type) type {
 pub fn copyStruct(comptime T: type, source: T, field_overrides: anytype) T {
     var result: T = undefined;
 
-    comptime inline for (@typeInfo(@TypeOf(field_overrides)).Struct.fields) |field| {
+    comptime for (@typeInfo(@TypeOf(field_overrides)).Struct.fields) |field| {
         if (!@hasField(T, field.name)) @compileError("override contains bad field" ++ field);
     };
 
@@ -254,9 +254,8 @@ pub const TupleBuilder = struct {
         comptime {
             var fields: [self.types.len]StructField = undefined;
             for (self.types, 0..) |Type, idx| {
-                var num_buf: [128]u8 = undefined;
                 fields[idx] = .{
-                    .name = std.fmt.bufPrint(&num_buf, "{d}", .{idx}) catch @compileError("failed to write field"),
+                    .name = std.fmt.comptimePrint("{d}", .{idx}),
                     .type = Type,
                     .default_value = null,
                     // TODO: is this the right thing to do?